Wednesday, November 30, 2005
Tuesday, November 29, 2005
Thursday, November 24, 2005
The Phantom Time Hypothesis
When Dr. Hans-Ulrich Niemitz introduces his paper on the “phantom time hypothesis,” he kindly asks his readers to be patient, benevolent, and open to radically new ideas, because his claims are highly unconventional. This is because his paper is suggesting three difficult-to-believe propositions: 1) Hundreds of years ago, our calendar was polluted with 297 years which never occurred; 2) this is not the year 2005, but rather 1708; and 3) The purveyors of this hypothesis are not crackpots.
The Phantom Time Hypothesis suggests that the early Middle Ages (614-911 A.D.) never happened, but were added to the calendar long ago either by accident, by misinterpretation of documents, or by deliberate falsification by calendar conspirators. This would mean that all artifacts ascribed to those three centuries belong to other periods, and that all events thought to have occurred during that same period occurred at other times, or are outright fabrications. For instance, a man named Heribert Illig (pictured), one of the leading proponents of the theory, believes that Charlemagne was a fictional character. But what evidence is this outlandish theory based upon?
More...
How could i not trust a face like that? He looks like he should be ploting the over-throw of the earth rather than publishing history theories.
Actually, doesn't he look like Dr. Trask? You comic geeks know who i'm talking about.
The Phantom Time Hypothesis suggests that the early Middle Ages (614-911 A.D.) never happened, but were added to the calendar long ago either by accident, by misinterpretation of documents, or by deliberate falsification by calendar conspirators. This would mean that all artifacts ascribed to those three centuries belong to other periods, and that all events thought to have occurred during that same period occurred at other times, or are outright fabrications. For instance, a man named Heribert Illig (pictured), one of the leading proponents of the theory, believes that Charlemagne was a fictional character. But what evidence is this outlandish theory based upon?
More...
How could i not trust a face like that? He looks like he should be ploting the over-throw of the earth rather than publishing history theories.
Actually, doesn't he look like Dr. Trask? You comic geeks know who i'm talking about.
Am I the only person who doesn't give a shit about the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade?
Maybe it's just me, but it's soooooo boring!
Wednesday, November 23, 2005
Tuesday, November 22, 2005
Never fuck with beta releases
i downloaded the latest beta release for Firefox 1.5, and all hell broke lose. i couldn't post on messageboards or use Stumbleupon. What's the point of the internet at that point? It took me 2 hours to get everything set back the way i like it.